
Review the word list to see which words you know and actively utilize and which you do not. Then use the conversation below to improve your intonation and examine appropriate usage of these words.
| Word | Pronunciation |
| 1. absurd | ub-SURD |
| 2. allocation | al-o-KĀ-shun |
| 3. fallacious | fu-LĀ-shus |
| 4. preconceived | pree-kun-SEEVD |
| 5. antiquated | AN-ti-kway-ded |
| 6. fabricate | FA-bri-kate |
| 7.unbiased | un-BI-yust |
| 8. coherent | cō-HER-ent |
| 9. accentuate | ak-SEN-choo-ate |
| 10. omit | ō-MIT |
| 11. portray | pōr-TRAY |
| 12. disguise | dis-GUYZ |
| 13. partisan | PAHR-ti-zun |
| 14. placid | PLA-sid |
| 15. phenomena | fe-NO-me-nu |
| 16. sheltered | SHEL-terd |
| 17. magnitude | MAG-ni-tood |
| 18. predominant | pree-DO-mi-nunt |
| 19. oblige | u-BLĪJ |
| 20. archaic | ahr-KAY-ik |
💬 Developer Dialogue: The Code Review
Characters:
- Alex: A seasoned developer, focused on clean architecture.
- Ben: A newer developer, who wrote the code being reviewed.
Alex: “Thanks for submitting the new feature code, Ben. I’ve started reviewing it. First off, I think your method for resource allocation is a bit… antiquated. We moved away from that synchronized block approach months ago.”
Ben: (Slightly defensive) “But I followed the pattern from the old documentation. I had this preconceived notion it was still the predominant way to handle shared memory access.”
Alex: “That documentation is archaic, honestly. Using it here is creating a potential bottleneck of serious magnitude. Furthermore, your argument that the existing library calls oblige us to use that method is entirely fallacious.”
Ben: “I see. I tried to portray the locking mechanism as lightweight, but if it’s causing that much thread contention, I should probably omit it entirely and use the new concurrent utility classes, right?”
Alex: “Exactly. We need a more unbiased and performant approach. The way you currently disguise the locking logic inside a helper method doesn’t really help either. It makes the main service class look deceptively placid when it’s actually hiding complexity.”
Ben: “So, essentially, you’re saying my architecture isn’t coherent because I used an absurdly old locking mechanism? I’m sorry, I should have checked the updated best practices.”
Alex: “It’s not absurd, Ben, just outdated. And yes, a coherent architecture is key. Now, this section here—you seem to be trying to fabricate a unique exception handling flow. Why not use the standard microservice error codes?”
Ben: “I wanted to accentuate the severity of this specific error, which deals with sensitive data phenomena.”
Alex: “I understand the need to highlight it, but we have to stick to standards. We can accentuate the severity in the logging or monitoring, not by inventing a custom exception class. Let’s refactor this for modern concurrency.”
Ben: “Understood. I’ll get to work on the changes immediately.”
Take English Classes
Improve your communication with one-to-one classes. Get a pre- and post- assessment to focus on measurable results.

Leave a comment